I just saw a Tweet by Assemblyman Scott Hammond (R-13) where he invited me to take a look at his new campaign website. Since Assemblyman Hammond is my assemblyman, I did go to take a look and I found it interesting.

Right on the front page is an article titled "Clearing Up The Lies". You see, Assemblyman Hammond was recently on Face-To-Face with John Ralston in a debate with his Senate 18 opponent, Richard McArthur.

Ralston showed a video clip where then candidate Hammond stated, “I want people to look at me and if I tell them I won’t raise your taxes I want them to understand that I won’t. You know, I walk up to my commitments and I keep them. When I tell you face-to-face that I’m not going to raise taxes, I don’t think I have to sign a piece of paper to prove it.” (More info HERE)

In the 2011 session, Assemblyman Hammond did vote to extend the $620 Million in taxes which were set to expire or "sunset". The interesting thing about this is, on his website, Hammond states "The extension of the sunsets did not increase taxes."

Although the extension of these sunset taxes technically did not increase taxes, the point is that thanks to Assemblyman Hammond we are currently paying $620 Million more in taxes today than we are supposed to be paying!

If today we are paying $620 MILLION in taxes that we were promised we would not be paying today, how is that not a tax increase? Are you as tired of the "Doublespeak" as I?

Hammond goes on to say in his website "No one person, business or family is paying more in taxes now than they did before I took office."

Exactly.

We're not paying any MORE but the fact is WE SHOULD BE PAYING LESS!

I don't know about you but if our elected officials promised us a "temporary" tax that would expire in two years, shouldn't they keep their word and let the taxes expire when they were promised?

Assemblyman Hammond is currently running for the State Senate 18 seat against Assemblyman Richard McArthur. Hammond has already stated publicy that he supports making the $620 Million in "temporary" tax PERMANENT.

I think the taxpayers in Nevada would rather see these "temporary" taxes disappear as promised and have their elected officials keep their word, for a change.

I think you can see why you must tell the candidates that "If you don't sign the Tax Pledge, you don't get my vote!"

As a candidate for Assembly 13, I have signed the Tax Pledge and am the only Assembly 13 candidate to do so.

Assemblyman Richard McArthur is running for the Senate 18 seat, has one of the most conservative voting records in the Assembly and has also signed the Tax Pledge. He is also the only candidate for Senate 18 to do so.

The choice is clear, if you don't want your taxes raised and would want the "temporary" taxes to be temporary, tell the candidates, "If you don't sign the Tax Pledge, you don't get my vote!"



 
 
I was looking forward to participating in the Nevada Caucus held this past Saturday, Feb. 4th. It was an opportunity for my daughter, Tabitha to participate in her first election. To be sure we wouldn't miss out, we arrived at our location at 8:15 AM.

The check-in went smoothly and we were directed to proper classroom for our precint. We stepped inside and there were a few people already there. By the supposed 9:00 start time there were around 45 of us in total.

As we sat and watched the clock, many of us started to wonder when we were going to start. My good friend Steve Sanson, who is President of Veterans in Politics, was sitting behind me so we chatted as the time went by. 9:15, 9:30, 9:45 came and went. My daughter looked at me and said "Wasn't this sipposed to start at 9:00?" I replied "Yes" and told her to remember I told her there may be problems.

Well, 10:00 finally arrived and someone "In Charge" came into the room to help us get started. As we didn't have an "official" representative, we were told that we would need to elect one from the people in the room.  This we did and it went smoothly. We then all needed to check-in to make sure that we were in the correct room and that the number of people in the room matched the number who had signed in.

We then had the opportunity to speak for our favorite Presidential candidate. After this, we all voted, the votes were counted and we were done. All this took about 45 minutes so we left at around 10:45. So far so good.

From what I heard later, most of the caucusing was done by Noon at most locations. It's just a matter of counting the votes and posting the results.

This is when things got a bit complicated with the Nevada GOP.

By 10:00 PM, a whole 12 hours AFTER most locations were done, we still didn't have the "Official" count. By around 4:00 AM, the count still wasn't done.

Is counting the voted really that difficult? My caucus was held at Arbor View High School. Each precinct was in a separate room. How hard is it for each precinct to tally the votes and bring the results to the person in charge who could then take each precint total and write it down on a sheet of paper and total the votes for all the precincts? This person would then take the sealed envelopes, alone with their total sheet, to the Republican Headquarters where someone there could take the caucus location "Total Sheet" and put the numbers on their master sheet and total all the caucus locations numbers.

Sounds simple, doesn't it? Well, for some reason, that's not what happened. So here it was, 4:00 AM the following Sunday, and the vote totals were still not available.

Getting back to when we were sitting in the room waiting for the caucus to start, one discussion came up more than once from quite a few people. We need to have a Primary instead of the Caucus.

My neighbors were sitting in front of me and they agreed that Nevada needs to go to a Primary. Their reason was that their daughter was up in Reno and thus could not participate in the Caucus. If Nevada did a Primary, her daughter could have voted by mail.

I have to wonder how many others were in the same boat? How many others were there who didn't have transportation? How many others were there who don't know what a Caucus is and how and why this works?

I'd say quite a few.

Which is why I support Nevada switching to a Primary for Presidential candidates. We do this for State and local elections and everyone understands how this works.

Once elected to Nevada Assembly for District 13, I would support changing from a Caucus to a Primary. Let's keep things simple.
 
 
This speach is just as relevent today as it was then. Televised Campaign Address for Goldwater Presidential Campaign - 10/27/64.
 
 
Steve Gunn of the Education Action Group embraced today a collective bargaining reform I feel is desperately needed now: If collective bargaining sessions aren’t open to the public to witness and monitor, then taxpayers “should have veto power” by requiring a public vote before any such agreement can take effect.

I couldn’t agree more.

 
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Date: Nov. 2, 2011
Contact: Leonard Foster 702-318-1158

LEONARD FOSTER TO RUN FOR NEVADA ASSEMBLY

Southern Nevada Republican running for Nevada Assembly, District 13

(Las Vegas, NV) Today, southern Nevada resident and businessman, Leonard Foster, announced his candidacy for the Nevada Assembly in District 13. Assembly District 13 is currently held by Assemblyman Scott Hammond who has announced his candidacy for the Nevada Senate.

“I look forward to the opportunity to serve the people of Nevada.” Foster stated. “The people of Assembly District 13, and Nevada, want an Assemblyman who will follow the Oath of Office and offer meaningful solutions to the challenges we now face.”

“In 1978, I enlisted in the US Navy and took an Oath to defend the Constitution of the United States. With your help, I can continue to honor this Oath by representing the people of Nevada as your Assemblyman. Together, we can bring real reform to our broken education system and offer real solutions to the unemployment challenge we now face.”

Leonard moved to southern Nevada in 1990 with his wife, Charlene, and currently live in the Centennial Hills area with 9 of their 10 children. Leonard has worked in the casino industry and is currently owner of a water treatment business in Las Vegas. You can visit his campaign website at www.leonardfoster.com.

 
 
Ineptocracy (in-ept-o-cra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.